DraftONE
Hardware- 14 Devlogs
- 62 Total hours
DraftONE is a fully custom core-XY 3d printer, with additional features such as hot-swappable toolheads, and modular toolheads (can be swapped to a lighter, high-flow or a router bit)
DraftONE is a fully custom core-XY 3d printer, with additional features such as hot-swappable toolheads, and modular toolheads (can be swapped to a lighter, high-flow or a router bit)
Devlog #14: Introducing VKTR
so as you can see i did forget to devlog 
its alr tho i got some INSANE changes watch out
The name is inspired by the vectoring i had to use for my ducting but somehow i accidentally put a K instead of a C but didnt notice??? still sounds cool asf tho
The entire gantry is reworked to make this voron-compatible and to make this workable with voron toolheads. this allows me to not only use the toolheads I make, but rather the ones anyone in the voron community makes to work on this
new V2 Frame with V2 Bed! 220220195 total volume, and now its considerable more stable and cleaner looking (with extra space for rgb!!!)
as of right now, the entire motion system should be done!!! time for enclosure and elec spacing, and we can actually build this!!!
Devlog #13: Restructuring
I realized I’ve gone about this a completely wrong way. I’ve been overcomplicating this gantry wayy too much, and ended up making this so much more complicated and a LOT weaker than it could be.
As a result, I am re-doing the whole CoreXY Motion system!!!
So what I have accomplished:
Devlog #12: Frame(work)
-so main thing is that ive been out of town for some time so im lwk just doing work whenever possible, so this is what im doing:
ok ill prob write more once i get back but yeah thats maily what ive done
Devlog #11: ANOTHER new toolhead???
overall a very productive devlog!!!
so what I worked on:
Introducing the DoubleDecker Toolhead, a larger, all-in-one toolhead with a direct drive extruder and bi-directional cooling done via double part cooling fans. Despite the many added features, it weiths around 240 grams, which is significantly less than the Voron Stealthburner (a reference for this toolhead). Alongside that, it uses an entirely surface-modeled duct, based off of multiple Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations.
modified the sailfin even more to better suit my needs (better mounting solution, smaller packaging) and now fits very well into my packaging
ik i said it alr but: the duct!!! it took me like 1-2 hours of surface modelling to get the geometries just right, but its definitely paid off (looks tuff asl, works well)
ok so thats p much it for my devlog, heres my bucket list:
ok byeee
Devlog # 10: Packaging Headache
so what i actually achieved:
one cool thing about this toolhead is that despite the extra direct drive extruder, its still very light, sitting at around 180 grams total. heavier than my previous sub-90 toolheads but this should be better consistency-wise and work very well with filaments like TPU and TPA.
in the next devlog, i’m gonna be reworking the mounting of the sailfin toolhead to fit into this better, but I’d say that this actually was a pretty locked in session.
Devlog #9: Triple it and give it to the next person
WOW. This is genuinely one of the best checkpoints im at. i did not expect to be able to get here lol
so what i did:
TWO new hotends!!!
Updated gantry:
so I fixed the main issue with the gantry, being pulleys in the center. If theyre in the center, it ends up being very weird belt geometry wise due to how CoreXY is rigged, and as a result, had to make the gentry idlers side-agonistic, meaning the belt path will stay perfectly parallel to the gantry.
updated clamp plates:
these clamp plates ACTUALLY WORK!!! ikr ts so cool
Devlog #8: A Big Mis-step
stuff i worked on that actually works:
so i realized wayyyy too late that for coreXY rigging i need to have the belt run parallel to the x axis 😭 i thought i could get away with angled belts but sadly i do have to redo the carriage clamps for belting
also I thought up of a newer and better system to add more modularity:
so yeah thats pretty much it for today!!!
Devlog #7: Unpowered Gantry and a smaller toolhead
so so far, all I’ve done is shorten the toolhead, and made a gantry structure wise. One main thing I need to do later is actually add corexy hardware but trust we’re getting there.
Alongside the gantry work, i shortened the toolhead by approx ~20mm and brought it significantly closer to the carriage to reduce the amount of forces on it as a result of it being so far. for both of these i do need to work on adding the coreXY rigging, but thats something i can work on later so im not too worried about it.
Devlog #6: what is a toolhead
so basically although this is somewhat of a smaller devlog time-wise, i got my whole toolhead plus swapping mechanism done!!!
so how it works:
some cool nerd tech specs:
so yeah cant wait to do more!!! see yall next one
Devlog #5: An actually Productive Devlog???
So i re-did the whole extruder assemble and it looks so nice now!!!
not pictured:
so basically i re-did this to be as small and lightweight as possible, and as a result i got it to look SUPER cool, and looks so nice and almost like an actually good printer!!!
On the latch/toolchange mechanism:
this has gone past multiple modifications over the past hour. Initially, I thought it would be best to have a whole hub that uses clips to latch onto the carriage, but i ended up settling with just using a single servo arm to hold the latching and adding stability screws so it should (keyword: should) be precise enough to not add any slop.
ok first nice productive devlog in some time, time to get some rest!!!
DEVLOG #4: Am I going the wrong way???
So I spent some time today working on a toolhead, but realized I might be doing this wrong.
This is originally for a stock hotend setup that is larger so that it ends up being the same size as a larger direct drive hotend for more sensitive filaments such as TPU. But i realized, i might just be thinking about this the wrong way…
Instead of making a direct drive extruder thats larger and heavier, what if I just use a bowden extruder (like all my other extruders on this printer) thats a lot more sensitive and conservative performance wise for TPU instead of a direct drive extruder.
Alongside this, I cant just use a standard extruder because it would end up causing the TPU to bind, meaning I’m going to have to design a custom spring loaded extruder. I might also use the same extruders for my other extruders due to how much better a spring loaded extruder is compared to a fixed extruder, despite the added complexity.
after a break, I decided it’d be better for me to just let go of the double hotend idea.
the main thing is that it just overcomplicates the idea wayyyy too much and ends up just being worse:
the main ideology behind the double hotend tool was so that I can print supports with a larger .8mm nozzle, speeding up print times due to higher flow and taller layer heights.
what I didnt realize was that if I did do this, it would be extremely messy with dual nozzles as theres a high chance the secondary nozzle would just hit the newly printed layers on a large enough part.
Also, I wouldnt be able to take the taller layers to my advantage due to the fact that theres a .4mm nozzle that physically cant do those tall layer heights and it ends up becoming too messy, pretty much just handicapping the performance of the .8mm nozzle
The new idea: just have a seperate high flow toolhead with a .8mm nozzle thats just as light as a single toolhead, which can take advantage of the higher print speed and the taller layer heights
To replace the double hotend tool, I came up with the idea for another toolhead:
so basically my current toolheads use a bowden tube extruder, which essentially is having the actual extruder part of the toolhead somewhere on the printer frame, and it feeds filament from there into the hotend. It saves alot of weight, but ends up being worse for some filaments (like TPU) which bind very easily and cause issues with a bowden setup (which is why tpu doesnt work well on the AMS!).
The idea is having a heavier toolhead which has the main purpose of using a Direct Drive extrusion setup, using a Nema17 Stepper sitting on the actual toolhead, and unlike the bowden setup that “pushes” filament and causes binding, this “pulls” in filament and reduces binding risk. the extra weight means I wont be able to print as fast, but means that it’d be compatible with filaments sensitive to binding up such as TPU.
ik this is a yap session, sorry to the reviewers that have to read this in advance!!!
I have also attached my base level airflow diagram for the single nozzle setup because you guys deserve more data :)
The extra space for the outtake fan also acts as a ledge to mount the Nema17 Stepper motor for the direct drive toolhead (im trying to keep everything the same size to help uniformity when i make the toolchanger.)
(also disclaimer the ai response was edited i wish google gemini could be this blunt)
after some onshape work, I have a normal looking printbed! its inspired by the triple lead screw beds found on many coreXY printers, and based on an equilateral triangle for better triangulation for printbed leveling.
the idea of a modular 3d printer:
so I was bored and thought, “what if i could make a 3d printer that has dual hotends for faster printing and better supports, but then also a toolchanger so i can swap it to a lighter single hotend, or even potentially a router endmill? so my main goal from this devlog was to capture the planning I’ve done with choosing materials for the gantry, movement, and the extrusion system. only the electronigc to go and I can get CAD started!