You are browsing as a guest. Sign up (or log in) to start making projects!

13h 13m 51s logged

This is v1 of the overall robot arm build, which is a 3 DOF antagonistic drive pick and placer, inspired by factory palletizing robots. It’s the first physical version of a linkage-driven arm I’ve been working on in SolidWorks. I already got a few issues with this version, just from looking at it on screen, but I’m going to 3D print it to see how it actually behaves in the real world before making changes.

Design Approach
I used existing automation robot references for primitive geometry; referenced from Fanuc, KUKA, and Panasonic industrial/palletizing robots. These companies have decades of field-proven arm geometry behind them, so rather than guessing at joint offsets and link ratios from scratch, I used their designs as a sanity check for what actually works in practice. I’m already researching their electronic work using different control options like CANBUS and EtherCAT to implement (at least one version) into this robot.

For the largest (by volume) components (anything with organic-looking cutouts or holes) I ran SolidWorks’ topology optimization instead of hand-sketching lightening patterns. To make sure my studies were actually improving my design instead of making it worse, I cross referenced different parts across the industry (excavators, cranes, and other heavy equipment, since an excavator is what inspired me to create this robot) and used my knowledge in steel mechanics to see if a part would hold from a glance.

I designed with FDM 3D printing’s strengths and weaknesses specifically in mind rather than just printing “machined part” geometry and expecting it not to break. At the same time, I kept track of which components are candidates to eventually remake in aluminum once the design is proven out, so the plastic-specific DFM choices don’t paint me into a corner for a metal version down the line.

What’s Next

Print V1 and put it through real motion /hand-stress testing to confirm (or rule out) the issues I’m already suspecting. Then, I’ll revise the design based on what breaks, binds, or flexes more than it should have. After, I’ll start on the electronics side, although I’m going in with limited parts on hand, so that’ll be its own challenge.

0
28

Comments 0

No comments yet. Be the first!