DEVLOG #5 (might be the last devlog) Hey! It’s been 11 days since the last devlog. DOSEFIELD wasn’t abandoned—I was just busy building instead of writing.This update was really about two things: making the code cleaner and making the site feel like it belongs in a space mission.The first issue was hidden in the background. The NASA validation numbers on the website were calculated separately from the ones used in my research. The math was identical, but it existed in multiple places. That meant one future change could easily make the numbers disagree.So I refactored everything to use a single source of truth. Now every result comes from the same function, making the site much easier to maintain and much harder to break.Then I focused on the design. The old version worked, but it didn’t feel like DOSEFIELD. I redesigned the interface with a mission-control style, added a cleaner layout, and simplified the visuals. I also removed a lot of unnecessary effects—less glow, fewer gradients, and a more purposeful look.After all those changes, I reran every test. All 107 tests still pass, and the stopping-power calculations remain within 1.55% of NIST reference data, exactly as before.There’s still one limitation: my model predicts about 67% of the radiation dose measured by NASA during the trip to Mars. That’s because it doesn’t yet simulate secondary particle production inside spacecraft shielding. It’s an important limitation, and it’s clearly explained on the website rather than hidden.The biggest lesson from this update wasn’t about physics—it was about revisiting old work. Good code doesn’t duplicate logic, and good design doesn’t rely on effects to look impressive. Sometimes the best improvement is simply cleaning up what you already built.