You are browsing as a guest. Sign up (or log in) to start making projects!

7h 25m 31s logged

Hitting 100hrs and final ship

Didnt get time to work on this idea, since quite the while.

And it has js about reached the state i can probably get it to MoE arch works, dense models work, cpu/gpu streaming works well, context/kv cache is also dynamically quanted lm_head quants are also there now

The motivation really died out because of this project not getting reviewed its been over a month, leaving this as is, tho its not perfect, but it js about has enough features that i wanted

Here are the final results after a ton of benchmarking-

  • Phi-4: ThinTensor 28.21 tok/s vs llama.cpp 17.50 tok/s — 1.61× faster (+61.2%). Quality: 0.999949 cosine vs 0.997281.

  • OpenReasoning-Nemotron-14B: ThinTensor 23.79 tok/s vs llama.cpp 19.79 tok/s — 1.20× faster (+20.2%). Quality: 0.999533 vs 0.967140.

  • Llama 3.2 11B: ThinTensor 41.02 tok/s vs llama.cpp 39.82 tok/s — 1.03× faster (+3.0%). Quality: 0.995095 vs 0.991938.

  • Qwen3.5-9B: ThinTensor 43.28 tok/s vs llama.cpp 42.83 tok/s — 1.01× faster (+1.1%). Quality: 0.973334 vs 0.894908.

  • GPT-OSS-20B: ThinTensor 50.34 tok/s vs llama.cpp 40.36 tok/s — 1.25× faster (+24.7%). Quality: 0.983299 vs 0.792350.

*all are apples to apples btw

Overall: ThinTensor beats llama.cpp Q4 throughput on 5/5 tested architectures, with a geometric-mean speedup of approximately 1.203×.

Probably gonna take a break, and learn before comming back to this, after the ship-2 on stardance!

0
13

Comments 0

No comments yet. Be the first!